Florida and Puerto Rico are competing with Texas for the site of the new SpaceX launch site, according to the Orlando Sentinel. Texas appears to have the inside track, however, according to a statement by CEO Elon Musk as reported by the Associated Press.

Why is Texas leading the race for the SpaceX facility?

José Pérez-Riera, Puerto Rico’s secretary for economic development and commerce, points out that the island commonwealth is closer to the equator than either Cape Canaveral or Brownsville. That would translate into slightly greater lift capacity for SpaceX rockets. SpaceX might also benefit from lower labor costs and the fact that Puerto Rico residents do not pay US income taxes.

On the other hand, a Puerto Rico launch site would come with some political uncertainty. Puerto Rico’s commonwealth status could change in the future if the island opts for either statehood or independence. Statehood would change the tax situation, but independence could be particularly worrisome. As an independent nation, Puerto Rico would be subject to US export controls, requiring ITAR permits for every rocket and payload.

Florida officials have argued that locating a second SpaceX pad in that state would save money by eliminating redundancy in the SpaceX supply chain. Redundancy, however, may be exactly what SpaceX is seeking. Locating all of its launch sites in one geographic area would leave SpaceX vulnerable to a localized natural disaster. The Florida Space Coast is infamously vulnerable to storm surge. In 2004, Hurricane Frances threatened to wipe out the entire Shuttle infrastructure.

Increasing its presence in Texas would also increase SpaceX’s base of political support. There’s also the matter of proximity to Johnson Space Center and the surrounding manned space community. That may be a small consideration at present, since NASA currently plans to make Kennedy Space Center the lead for commercial crew activities. That, too, is a political consideration that could change in the future, however. With Congressional elections every two years, it behooves SpaceX to keep its options open. A Texas launch site would also be a signal to the Florida delegation that they cannot take SpaceX for granted.

 

Written by Astro1 on June 20th, 2012 , Spaceports, SpaceX Tags:

Leave a Reply to Paul Breed Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

COMMENTS
    Paul Breed commented

    It’s also possible that a Tx launch site would enable a 1st stage recovery without a boost back. IE Rocket launches from TX and first stage lands intact like the reuse video shows, in Fl, or on a barge near Fl.

    Reply
    June 20, 2012 at 12:27 pm
    Harold Morales commented

    Think it would be great to see SpaceX have its launch site in Puerto Rico. SpaceX would benefit from the islands being so close the equator and not have to deal with any cold weather. Puerto Rico will always remain a commonwealth to the US. So SpaceX the next bold step and select Puerto Rico as your Space hub.

    Reply
    July 6, 2012 at 9:13 am