NASA Nano-satellite Launch Challenge
Rumors say the $3 million Nano-Satellite Launch Challenge, funded by NASA and run by the Space Florida Small Satellite Research Center, is about to be canceled. The official announcement is said to be coming Monday. [Update: See It’s Dead, Jim.]

The goal of the Nano-satellite Launch Challenge was to encourage the development of new systems for low-cost, frequent launches of small payloads. Space Florida published draft rules for the competition back April. Since then, progress appears to have stalled. The following post appeared on the Space Florida blog on September 26:

The Competition has remained in a holding pattern. NASA has the revised Draft Rules for the Challenge. NASA made a decision to issue a RFI seeking additional information on the demand for a small satellite launch vehicle prior to approving the revised Draft Rules. Pending the analysis of the results of that RFI in September, we are still waiting on NASA to make a final determination on the revised Draft Rules. Until that is done, we cannot move forward.

NASA’s Request for Information can be found here.

Numerous individuals and organizations have commented on the need for a dedicated low-cost launch system for small satellites. The fact that the Nano-satellite Launch Challenge may be coming to an end is disappointing. It means the small-satellite launch gap will continue, but it also spells a setback for NASA’s Centennial Challenges program which has been drifting in recent years due to lack of funding and direction.

Of course, we understand why NASA would want to issue a Request For Information to seek further information on demand for small satellite launcher. $3 million is a huge chunk of taxpayer’s money, and it would be irresponsible to throw it away on a rocket for which there may be no need. This does make us wonder, though – did NASA issue an RFI seeking information on the demand for the $20-billion Space Launch System before going ahead with full-scale development?

Written by Astro1 on November 20th, 2012 , Nanosatellites

Leave a Reply to Charles Pooley Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Charles Pooley commented

    This is a disappointment. With Microlaunchers I was looking for this as a means to find a few seriously interested. The value of a space analog to the microcomputers is not yet understood, but will be of immense value.

    The theory that NASA is not interested in something paradigm changing, but just some addition to what they are doing is one theory.

    But there may have been some deep problem with the choice of Space Florida as the managing organization. Since they are a space services company I’ve always thought there was a conflict of interest there.

    November 21, 2012 at 10:34 am
    Anne Hudson commented

    With the joint Army/NASA SWORDS program well underway with a goal of 25 kilos (50 lbs) to 28.5 degrees for $1M, the why would NASA fund a separate Challenge to achieve the same goal? Maybe the left hand has finally figure out what the right hand is doing.

    November 21, 2012 at 2:58 pm
      admin commented

      Although, it isn’t clear how (or if) the SWORDS rocket will be made available to civilian customers.

      November 21, 2012 at 3:09 pm
    Mike Poller commented

    I have received official notification that NASA is exercising its right to terminate the Space Act Agreement implementing the NanoSat Launch Challenge

    November 27, 2012 at 4:09 pm